Bad A$$ photo..you should consider submitting it for our next calender!!!
tel us how the car did on the track, inquiring minds want to know ...
tel us how the car did on the track, inquiring minds want to know ...
JRV said:Bad A$$ photo..you should consider submitting it for our next calender!!!
tel us how the car did on the track, inquiring minds want to know ...![]()
i think he ment the 360s were 3 secs slower than the G-car.murclovr said:the 360s were 3 seconds slower than the F40,and you were 8? that cant be right....?
Love the F mech quote!!usbikepro said:he said and I quote "I didn't realize that the Gallardo was this good. It is so much better than the 360 that Ferrari is really going to have to come up with something big for the next generation 360 (F430). But I'm obviously not going to tell any of my customers that." I'm trying to get some info from Lamborghini about turning my car into a full track car but haven't got much (any) feedback. Ideas anyone?
That is why Ferrari needs the F430 to save face.arionma said:remember G is a newer car than 360...so it maybe because of the G was still running-in and that's why there was only 3 secs ahead...hahaha :evil: