Lamborghini Talk banner

$200k Payout for Lamborghini STO Loss of Use (LOU) and Diminished Value Claim (DV/DIV) (CA)

4 reading
5.3K views 56 replies 25 participants last post by  f0cus  
#1 ·
Hire an attorney if you need help with an insurance claim. I am not an attorney. I am certain there are procedural or legal errors in the story below. I am sharing to bring some awareness to the community on what I did, how I did it, and the results I achieved. I haven't seen too many threads or help on the internet for this topic. Hope it helps!

Accident Details:

So, a few months back, I took the STO out to go for coffee with one of my good friends. My friend left and then I decided to hit the coffee shop one more time before heading home. While I was in the coffee shop, somebody crashed into the STO (front passenger side impact) while it was parked.

Called the cops via their non-emergency line. They wouldn't come out because there were no injuries. Called tow truck and towed the Lambo home.

Dealing with the Insurance Company:

Collected insurance info from the other driver and called their insurance company the next day. The other driver already set up a claim. I attached my repair claim to their existing claim number.

Insurance company first recommended some shop that wasn't Lamborghini certified. I denied that and let them know that I'd be taking it to a certified shop. A few days later I got the car towed to a certified Lamborghini repair facility near my home. They were professional and seemed to run a tight ship. I was comfortable that they could handle the job. I figured I was in good hands with a shop that repairs Bugattis. They get started and return their report that reflected over $120k in damages.

After some additional inspections and back and forth, the total came to $135k in damages. Cofango replacement, new headlight, new rim, new lower control arm, new power steering rack, new wheel hub, etc. It was quite extraordinary that this much damage could be done in a parking lot. Insurance company came back and said the adjuster "reviewed the file" and said that everything could be handled for $40k. I insisted on the full amount recommended by the shop and let them know that I would pursue legal action if required. They came back after some back and forth and agreed to the $135k in repairs. This back and forth took a few weeks. Repairs started about a month after the STO arrived at the shop.

During the back and forth and for about two or three months, the insurance claim adjuster was constantly trying to offer me a $70 daily stipend for a rental car, and said that per policy, that's all I was entitled to. Denied those offers and let the adjuster know that I'd be handling my own rental situation.

After about two months, I started doing some research into Diminished Value Claims and Loss of use in California. I started the search for a Diminished Value and Loss of Use Professional. There are many out there but I do highly recommend Main Page | theautoappraiser-lsc. I gave them a call and it was quite informative. I sent in some info and received my report about a week later. We calculated loss of use with the estimated return date of my vehicle, as stated by the repair shop. Reports reflected $280k in Diminished Value and Loss of Use (calculated at 120 days, based on the shop's estimate). After a few edits, I accepted the report. Note, there are many auto appraisers that do this sort of thing. Do a web search and find someone competent that can handle your DV and LOU report.

A week after receiving my report, I submitted the claim to the claims agent. I used ChatGPT to generate a Loss of Use Demand and a Diminished Value Demand letter. I made some edits and sent both demand letters via email with the DV/DIV report and Loss of Use report and other evidence (STO rental car values) in the email. In the demand, I gave them 10 days to pay via certified check(s) or else I would consider using all legal avenues to achieve a "prompt, fair, and equitable settlement." I went for the full amount in both reports, so that I could set my negotiation anchor at the highest point. The insurance company asked for more time and asked that we start the clock after the car was in my possession. It was a reasonable ask, so I let them know that I expected payment 10 days after my car was returned.

The day after I got my car back, I contacted the claims agent and let them know that I expected payment within 10 days. They got back to me shortly thereafter and came back with an offer of $100k and some change. I told them that I "could not accept their offer" and they came back with another offer. They responded with a $120k offer a week later. Rinse and repeat. I told them that I "could not accept their offer" and at this point, in the interests of avoiding further legal escalation, I would give them a 5% discount on the Diminished Value settlement and a 30% discount on the Loss of Use settlement. They came back with an offer a little north of $200k. I accepted their offer and they sent a check within about 8 days. 3 rounds of negotiation. Case closed.

Claim 1: Repair claim of $135k paid to the body shop. Got my car back after 120 days.
Claim 2: Diminished Value Claim with a settlement of around $80k.
Claim 3: Loss of Use Claim with a settlement of around $120k.

Did I Leave Money on the Table? Probably, sure. But I'd rather get $200k settlement now rather than whatever the settlement might be after paying lawyer fees, etc.

Lessons I Learned:

1. Only communicate via email. Save all communication. Never agree to anything or make any statements to insurance claims agents over the phone. Better to let them know at the very beginning that they may not call, text, or leave any messages on your phone. Insurance claims agents cannot be trusted.
a. Pulling underhanded tactics via email is much harder than via the phone.
b. The insurance claims agent might do something that is contrary to insurance law in your state, and you'll want to keep that for your lawyer, if you end up having to make a complaint to the Insurance Commissioner, or if it escalates to court.

2. Always read insurance law docs in your state to make yourself aware of your rights. Apparently some states have no recourse for DV/DIV or LOU.

3. Always be professional, and never bring emotion into your negotiations. Be prepared to take it to court if you have to. Communicate your demands in a professional manner. Use Chat GPT if you are not good at writing.

4. Never get a rental car through the insurance company. Instead, get ready to file a loss of use claim about a month before your car is ready. If you get a rental car and it is reimbursed by the insurance company, you can't file a loss of use claim.

5. Hire a diminished value claims (and loss of use) professional to write up your DV/DIV report and LOU report. If anything, it lets the insurance company know that you are willing to spend money to get the result that you want and deserve.

6. Hire a property damage attorney to handle all this for you if you don't have the time or if you require some professional help with getting your claim handled. None of the "accident attorneys" would handle my claim if there was no bodily damage associated with the accident.

7. Submit your DV/DIV and LOU claim a few weeks before you get your car back in your possession. Although the insurance company that I dealt with wouldn't process it until I got my car back, I wanted to get both claims in the system ahead of time. The insurance company will come in and provide a bogus report that diminishes the value associated your claim (Both LOU and DV/DIV). Their bogus report used some random, proprietary calculation. Analyze and pick apart their report.

8. Process the claim through the insured's insurance company. I don't see a reason to process the claim through your insurance company if the other person is at fault (and you have their info).

9. Insurance companies will rarely offer you a fair settlement the first time around. Some insurance companies or claims agents are better to work with than others. Negotiations are a back and forth kind of thing. My negotiations took about two months or so. Figure out if you have any leverage (DV/DIV and LOU report) and be strategic about your communications and negotiations. They will try to get you to provide even more information or justification after submitting your DV/DIV and LOU reports. Always refer them back to the reports that you sent. They don't require any other info than what is in the DV/DIV and LOU reports.

10. The insurance claims agent lied to me a few times, so you should expect that your assigned insurance claims agent will lie to you as well.

11. Insurance company will use some national rent-a-car service to drop the value of your (Lamborghini) rental car's daily rate. In reality, there will be no cars available at that ultra-low price.

12. Use ChatGPT or some other LLM platform to formulate your responses. Made things pretty easy for me. Also used ChatGPT to weigh pros and cons at different points in the negotiation.

13. Even though much of the delay will be the insurance company's fault (time to get an adjuster to look at your car, their review process, etc) they will say that the shop is delaying and that they will not pay loss of use for the entire time that your vehicle was not in your possession. (more underhanded tactics)

14. Stay strong and always be ready to use the nuclear option of hiring an attorney.


References That Might Help in CA:



View Document - California Code of Regulations

List of Techniques the Insurance Company Used to Attempt to Lower Their Liability or Lower my Settlement:

Offered $70 per day for rental car, when rentals for a STO cost $2,499 a day in OC
Offered $90k less than what was required for repairs, also lied and said that the shop agreed to the lower amount when they had not
Tried to use their own tow truck company. My tow truck company had race ramps and a low profile ramp. My tow truck company costs more.
Tried to have me source parts from a third party dealer/reseller (not Lamborghini)
Tried to have me use a non-Lamborghini certified body shop
Tried to use a bogus diminished value report with proprietary calculations that artificially lowered the value of my DV/DIV claim
Told me to use my insurance instead of their insurance because it would be "faster"
Brought up a bogus quote at $1,250 a day for a "high performance vehicle" when they had no Lamborghini Huracans or STOs available
Came in at 1/3 of the full value DV/DIV and LOU for their initial settlement offer
Tried to say that the shop delayed the return of my vehicle, thus they would only cover me for half the days my car was gone, more underhanded tactics
Would not let me know what the liability limits were for the policy (I don't know if I was entitled to know this info, but it would have been nice to know for negotiations sake.)
 
#2 ·
Great advice, thank you for sharing these details. I'm glad you were able to reach a fairly decent settlement. Are you satisfied with the repair quality? I'm curious what your plan is with your STO moving forward and if you do sell it immediately, how much the actual diminished value will be. Does it feel any different to drive now? I think it would be difficult to get over the mental block knowing the car has been repaired following an accident. You'd be always wondering if something was off after every noise/vibration you experience.
 
#4 ·
Thanks for the reply. It was a long road but I feel like I've been made whole. Would have been better not to grab coffee that day, honestly.

I do not intend to sell the STO at all. Looking at picking up a Revuelto (SVJ?) race variant a few years. The only difference in feeling is the psychological factor of knowing that my STO has been violated. It is what it is.

Repair quality is like new. They did have to blend the doors but you can't tell it has been repainted. Or, at least I can't tell anyways. Slight rattle with one of the doors within a 100 rpm range, so will likely take it back to get it checked out at some point. Other than that, no issues.
 
#5 ·
Thanks for the reply. Glad you found it useful. Hopefully someone that is looking up this info will use it and get what they deserve in their settlement.

HA, if only ChatGPT were that good. I'd be on the beach having a robot and ChatGPT doing my work for me!
 
#10 ·
A dash cam can also be very helpful for these kinds of cases in the event you were moving when you are hit. Without video evidence you are left with a he said she said, and often it means no fault will be determined and you are out of luck with DV & LOU, this happened on my GT3 and being down 8 months for repairs.
 
#16 ·
Thanks much! I figured I might as well share this information because I spent many hours crawling the interwebs for this info.

The pics won't do much good as the damage was barely noticeable with the pictures that I took. Rim was scratched up, cofango was replaced due to a small crack, other parts replaced, etc. Also, looking to keep some sort of anonymity, hence not naming the insurance company and keeping round numbers for settlement amounts.
 
#17 ·
We're still quite a ways off from that! But using ChatGPT was definitely a gamechanger for me in this case. I even used it to calculate the chances of success for negotiating and weighed the pros and cons after getting my final offer, which I took. Was a good sounding board and decision support system.
 
#24 ·
Fantastic result and guidance for your co-members.
Plus this was done in California :)

The Loss of Use portion is of interest.

As I read, it implies you had a daily loss of use.
Compared to other states, I can certainly understand Calif DMV and insurance as excessive per day costs.
I make an assumption that depreciation is in Loss of Use as opposed to in Diminished Value.
The LOU is greater than the DV.
May I ask for more of the story on Loss of Use.

Also of interest is your use of AI - ChatCPT.
In my case, I could see the guidance of CPT as Legalize is a second language :)

Again, OP has a fantastic post.
 
#34 ·
Glad this is helpful to you all!

We calculated the loss of use which would equal the reasonable cost/daily rate to rent my car from a car rental service. We used local OC exotic car rental services to estimate and come to a figure. LOU in my case, was greater than DV. Depreciation was not a part of our calculations or considerations.

DV = the difference in price between selling pre-accident and selling post-accident. Having damage repaired lowers the value of your vehicle. A good DV appraiser will justify their calculations using industry standard methods (not some weird proprietary calculation).
 
#31 ·
I was flat out denied by ins co legal team about DV in CA. They said the ins policy didn’t have that coverage.

the advice from a third partyDV specialist was to take the driver to court. Once a judgement is issued, the ins will pay.

I didn’t press on as it’s wasn’t a Lambo.
 
#36 ·
Sorry to hear that! If it hasn't gone too long maybe chat with an attorney to see if there is anything that can be done about your situation. That's what I'd do. I was actually prepared to spend a lot on legal fees, on principal.
 
#37 ·
I hear ya, and although you are not wrong, truth be told, I would have rather stayed home that day. Imagine, my first lambo, violated by some distracted driver. Did not need the money, I went through this effort mostly on principal.
 
#33 ·
Great write up.

I've experienced it a few times, but I always put the claim through my insurance company, working out exactly what I expect in DV and LOU (in addition to the repairs of course) and my insurance pays it all without a complaint (as long as I provide water tight reasons to my calculations) and then they chase the other party's insurance company for the amount.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STO_Ghost
#46 ·
I did not use an attorney. I'd recommend that you reach out to a property damage attorney that is local to you if there are no injuries. If there are injuries, "Accident attorneys" will probably take your case and to the DV and LOU work as a part of the case. If you get a "no" ask for a referral.
 
#43 ·
Hire an attorney if you need help with an insurance claim. I am not an attorney. I am certain there are procedural or legal errors in the story below. I am sharing to bring some awareness to the community on what I did, how I did it, and the results I achieved. I haven't seen too many threads or help on the internet for this topic. Hope it helps!

Accident Details:

So, a few months back, I took the STO out to go for coffee with one of my good friends. My friend left and then I decided to hit the coffee shop one more time before heading home. While I was in the coffee shop, somebody crashed into the STO (front passenger side impact) while it was parked.

Called the cops via their non-emergency line. They wouldn't come out because there were no injuries. Called tow truck and towed the Lambo home.

Dealing with the Insurance Company:

Collected insurance info from the other driver and called their insurance company the next day. The other driver already set up a claim. I attached my repair claim to their existing claim number.

Insurance company first recommended some shop that wasn't Lamborghini certified. I denied that and let them know that I'd be taking it to a certified shop. A few days later I got the car towed to a certified Lamborghini repair facility near my home. They were professional and seemed to run a tight ship. I was comfortable that they could handle the job. I figured I was in good hands with a shop that repairs Bugattis. They get started and return their report that reflected over $120k in damages.

After some additional inspections and back and forth, the total came to $135k in damages. Cofango replacement, new headlight, new rim, new lower control arm, new power steering rack, new wheel hub, etc. It was quite extraordinary that this much damage could be done in a parking lot. Insurance company came back and said the adjuster "reviewed the file" and said that everything could be handled for $40k. I insisted on the full amount recommended by the shop and let them know that I would pursue legal action if required. They came back after some back and forth and agreed to the $135k in repairs. This back and forth took a few weeks. Repairs started about a month after the STO arrived at the shop.

During the back and forth and for about two or three months, the insurance claim adjuster was constantly trying to offer me a $70 daily stipend for a rental car, and said that per policy, that's all I was entitled to. Denied those offers and let the adjuster know that I'd be handling my own rental situation.

After about two months, I started doing some research into Diminished Value Claims and Loss of use in California. I started the search for a Diminished Value and Loss of Use Professional. There are many out there but I do highly recommend Main Page | theautoappraiser-lsc. I gave them a call and it was quite informative. I sent in some info and received my report about a week later. We calculated loss of use with the estimated return date of my vehicle, as stated by the repair shop. Reports reflected $280k in Diminished Value and Loss of Use (calculated at 120 days, based on the shop's estimate). After a few edits, I accepted the report. Note, there are many auto appraisers that do this sort of thing. Do a web search and find someone competent that can handle your DV and LOU report.

A week after receiving my report, I submitted the claim to the claims agent. I used ChatGPT to generate a Loss of Use Demand and a Diminished Value Demand letter. I made some edits and sent both demand letters via email with the DV/DIV report and Loss of Use report and other evidence (STO rental car values) in the email. In the demand, I gave them 10 days to pay via certified check(s) or else I would consider using all legal avenues to achieve a "prompt, fair, and equitable settlement." I went for the full amount in both reports, so that I could set my negotiation anchor at the highest point. The insurance company asked for more time and asked that we start the clock after the car was in my possession. It was a reasonable ask, so I let them know that I expected payment 10 days after my car was returned.

The day after I got my car back, I contacted the claims agent and let them know that I expected payment within 10 days. They got back to me shortly thereafter and came back with an offer of $100k and some change. I told them that I "could not accept their offer" and they came back with another offer. They responded with a $120k offer a week later. Rinse and repeat. I told them that I "could not accept their offer" and at this point, in the interests of avoiding further legal escalation, I would give them a 5% discount on the Diminished Value settlement and a 30% discount on the Loss of Use settlement. They came back with an offer a little north of $200k. I accepted their offer and they sent a check within about 8 days. 3 rounds of negotiation. Case closed.

Claim 1: Repair claim of $135k paid to the body shop. Got my car back after 120 days.
Claim 2: Diminished Value Claim with a settlement of around $80k.
Claim 3: Loss of Use Claim with a settlement of around $120k.

Did I Leave Money on the Table? Probably, sure. But I'd rather get $200k settlement now rather than whatever the settlement might be after paying lawyer fees, etc.

Lessons I Learned:

1. Only communicate via email. Save all communication. Never agree to anything or make any statements to insurance claims agents over the phone. Better to let them know at the very beginning that they may not call, text, or leave any messages on your phone. Insurance claims agents cannot be trusted.
a. Pulling underhanded tactics via email is much harder than via the phone.
b. The insurance claims agent might do something that is contrary to insurance law in your state, and you'll want to keep that for your lawyer, if you end up having to make a complaint to the Insurance Commissioner, or if it escalates to court.

2. Always read insurance law docs in your state to make yourself aware of your rights. Apparently some states have no recourse for DV/DIV or LOU.

3. Always be professional, and never bring emotion into your negotiations. Be prepared to take it to court if you have to. Communicate your demands in a professional manner. Use Chat GPT if you are not good at writing.

4. Never get a rental car through the insurance company. Instead, get ready to file a loss of use claim about a month before your car is ready. If you get a rental car and it is reimbursed by the insurance company, you can't file a loss of use claim.

5. Hire a diminished value claims (and loss of use) professional to write up your DV/DIV report and LOU report. If anything, it lets the insurance company know that you are willing to spend money to get the result that you want and deserve.

6. Hire a property damage attorney to handle all this for you if you don't have the time or if you require some professional help with getting your claim handled. None of the "accident attorneys" would handle my claim if there was no bodily damage associated with the accident.

7. Submit your DV/DIV and LOU claim a few weeks before you get your car back in your possession. Although the insurance company that I dealt with wouldn't process it until I got my car back, I wanted to get both claims in the system ahead of time. The insurance company will come in and provide a bogus report that diminishes the value associated your claim (Both LOU and DV/DIV). Their bogus report used some random, proprietary calculation. Analyze and pick apart their report.

8. Process the claim through the insured's insurance company. I don't see a reason to process the claim through your insurance company if the other person is at fault (and you have their info).

9. Insurance companies will rarely offer you a fair settlement the first time around. Some insurance companies or claims agents are better to work with than others. Negotiations are a back and forth kind of thing. My negotiations took about two months or so. Figure out if you have any leverage (DV/DIV and LOU report) and be strategic about your communications and negotiations. They will try to get you to provide even more information or justification after submitting your DV/DIV and LOU reports. Always refer them back to the reports that you sent. They don't require any other info than what is in the DV/DIV and LOU reports.

10. The insurance claims agent lied to me a few times, so you should expect that your assigned insurance claims agent will lie to you as well.

11. Insurance company will use some national rent-a-car service to drop the value of your (Lamborghini) rental car's daily rate. In reality, there will be no cars available at that ultra-low price.

12. Use ChatGPT or some other LLM platform to formulate your responses. Made things pretty easy for me. Also used ChatGPT to weigh pros and cons at different points in the negotiation.

13. Even though much of the delay will be the insurance company's fault (time to get an adjuster to look at your car, their review process, etc) they will say that the shop is delaying and that they will not pay loss of use for the entire time that your vehicle was not in your possession. (more underhanded tactics)

14. Stay strong and always be ready to use the nuclear option of hiring an attorney.


References That Might Help in CA:



View Document - California Code of Regulations

List of Techniques the Insurance Company Used to Attempt to Lower Their Liability or Lower my Settlement:

Offered $70 per day for rental car, when rentals for a STO cost $2,499 a day in OC
Offered $90k less than what was required for repairs, also lied and said that the shop agreed to the lower amount when they had not
Tried to use their own tow truck company. My tow truck company had race ramps and a low profile ramp. My tow truck company costs more.
Tried to have me source parts from a third party dealer/reseller (not Lamborghini)
Tried to have me use a non-Lamborghini certified body shop
Tried to use a bogus diminished value report with proprietary calculations that artificially lowered the value of my DV/DIV claim
Told me to use my insurance instead of their insurance because it would be "faster"
Brought up a bogus quote at $1,250 a day for a "high performance vehicle" when they had no Lamborghini Huracans or STOs available
Came in at 1/3 of the full value DV/DIV and LOU for their initial settlement offer
Tried to say that the shop delayed the return of my vehicle, thus they would only cover me for half the days my car was gone, more underhanded tactics
Would not let me know what the liability limits were for the policy (I don't know if I was entitled to know this info, but it would have been nice to know for negotiations sake.)
Thanks for posting this on the discussion thread.
 
#48 ·
I also used Lance/TAA awhile back for an older Ferrari. Very informative guy, always had an answer for insurance agents loopholes.

The other party's insurance company took their sweet time and wanted to prolong as long as possible by waiting for me to reach out every week attempting to get me to settle for nothing. Only two rounds but it lasted almost 2 months at which point I handed it off to an attorney and they were able to get my initial demands of 30k, up to 120k, of which 33% for lawyer fees. Sounds like you had a more understanding insurance company to deal with.
 
#50 ·
Really amazing and informative article. Super helpful. Thank you. However, does one's car needs to be involved in some sort of accident to achieve this and file a claim as such? What happens for example, if you have to replace an entirely new motor, deemed covered by warranty, and you are without your vehicle for more than 60-90 days? Does this situation still apply?
 
#53 ·
Do you think that loss of daily use would be applicable for a warranty repair?

My brand new evo needs the fuel tank replaced, 600 miles in. Dealer (lambo) offered me a daily rental from enterprise which I declined.

car has been there for 15 days now, untouched, waiting on parts from Italy...