|
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Register for FREE Access! | Home | Forum | Premium Member | Active Topics | Gallery / Garage | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
||||
|
Quote:
loooool. ur joking right?????? or is it, u do not have experiance in ether car??? becouse its a "No Brainer" to most..... ![]() |
|
|||
|
it depends on your preference, the 6.0 is easier on the muscles to drive, but the more original models were harder and straeneous in everyday driving, so your choice. keep in mind the older ones are cheaper to buy and other factors like insurance is also cheaper.
![]() |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Guage grounds Poor a/c Rear shaft Clutch Head lights Pod too big Seat belts Brakes Radio No P/S (I happen to like it without P/S) (This is to name a few...get the point now.) I own a 91 that was completely restored to perfect condition with all of the problems solved. I love the car and the fact that it is one of the first of it's kind is a great feeling. It will be part of my collection for a long time. My next one will be a 2001 or Murci. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
and also you have to know the 6.0 has more power, more torque, better handling .... the 91 are aniway lighter and 2wd, less refined car, no power steering: someone like to drive them more because the "old school feeling" p.s. the 6.0 is more expensive but from a collector point of view could become one of most desirable diablo (last model,great performance, many improvments, very few made), i don't see 91 going up in value in the same way anytime soon |
|
||||
|
Quote:
oterwise i personally prefer 2wd lighter diablos, in this order: 1-GT 2- SE 30 3- SV 4- 91 2wd Last edited by emilio : 07-21-2006 at 07:09 AM. |
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|